Return to other movies | Dean's Home Page.

AUTUMN 2002 MOVIE REVIEWS

Wow, I haven't seen hardly any movies this summer!  Nothing has much appealled to me.

Dean's rating scale:  ****Exceptionally good, ***Quite good indeed, ** I  liked some things about it, but found it to be something closer to average,* Not recommended.

I need to point out that I am not really as critical as I may sometimes sound from my reviews.  Generally, anything two stars or better is something I have enjoyed, and even those to which I only give one star probably have some aspects I have found redeeming, though I'd put them further down my list.  Anything with less than a star (that is 0 or 1/2) is an absolute or nearly absolute thumbs down.
 

Bloody Sunday

****

Bowling for Columbine

***

Mostly Martha

**1/2

Secretary

***

Spirited Away

*

White Oleander

**1/2

Bloody Sunday -- Rarely do we see the lines so clearly drawn in the first two minutes of a movie.  What follows is the most disturbingly realistic docudrama that I can recall seeing on any topic.  The story, of course, reenacts the horrific events of that fateful Sunday in January 1972 when all hell broke lose in the town of Derry, Northern Ireland, and resulted in what apparently became the unprovoked massacre of numerous civil rights activists.  The film is also one of the best I've seen to capture the views from both sides of a conflict, though we soon learn at whom the finger is pointed.  At times, the intensity of the violence and the sense of chaos and confusion rivals or even surpasses that of the urban warfare scenes of Black Hawk Down, and though the bullets are flying in every direction, they are mostly coming from one source  The shakey camera movement is straight out of The Blair Witch Project, but is used to much greater advantage in this case and really gives one the feeling of being caught up in the center of the action, though for some it may have the same dispeptic effect.  James Nesbitt is a sure Best Actor nominee for his portrayal of Ivan Cooper, a Protestant member of Parliament who heads a northern Irish Civil Rights Association and who attempts to lead a peaceful demonstration against the will of the British authorities and in spite of seeming attempts by elements on both sides to undermine the peace.  Other prominent well known civil rights activists are portrayed, such as Bernadette Devlin, but Nesbitt is the central figure.  Though the film is in color, the dark gray winter climate of Northen Ireland, together with the video tape quality of the film gives it the feeling of black-and-white news footage from that era.  The characters, particularly the British soldiars, are likewise portrayed with sort of a black and white quality, rather than multi-dimensionally and with much irony.  This is normally something for which I might downgrade an assessment of a film, but there's enough going on here for me to justify a four star rating.  The large cast of extras give the film an epic quality even though the entire event occurs over the course of but a day.  It is impossible to leave this film unmoved, and though it may not be your idea of entertainment, it is a most worthy use of your time.  (Kids -- too intense for many, teens and adulsts -- yes absolutely, unless realism is too disturbing for some)  **** 

Bowling for Columbine -- Why is it that Canadians, who have nearly as many guns per capita as Americans and are nearly as diverse, suffer fewer than one-tenth as many homicides?  This and other questions involving the high level of gun violence in America and the climate of fear surrounding such tragic events as the student slayings at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado are the focuses of Michael Moore's new film.   Michael Moore is sort of a Rush Limbaugh of the left, with all the moral indignation, but kinder, gentler and without the name calling and personal invective.  He gets criticized by reviewers for being self congratulatory, unlike Rush who's so over the top that, well, why criticize the obvious.  Rush calls his schtick "entertainment", and Moore's films are likewise better described using that term than to pass them off as documentaries, though the folks at the Cannes Film Festival saw fit this year for the first time to create a documentary category specifically for Moore's new film.  But Moore has a much keener sense of the ironic than Limbaugh.  Those familiar with Moore's other work, beginning 12 years ago when he chased down General Motor's CEO Roger Smith in the film "Roger and Me" that Moore's style is sort of a hybrid between so-called "reality" programming and contrived mockumentaryMoore again plays himself as an everyman in a baseball cap with a camera and a microphone.   Sure, he's a bit of a braggart.  Sure, he and his bleeding heart are a bit insufferable at times.  Sure, his entrapping interview tactics belie our sense of fairness and make us feel a little scummy -- Charleton Heston has alzhiemers after all, so cut him a little slack!  Still, Moore makes us laugh, usually when it's appropriate.  He makes us think, though like Limbaugh, not all that deeply.   And in this film, he horrifies us with our own irony.  I hope people will go to see it, and not just his fans on the left.  Although Moore flashes his long time National Rifle Association (NRA) credentials, he's clearly not a PROUD member of the NRA, and that's likely to be seen offensively among some in that organization, though he generally treats them with due respect.  Still, I think many of them will likewise see the ironies and find many things about which to be amused as well as provoked by this film.  (Kids -- more mature ones only; teens and adults -- yes!!!) ***

Mostly Martha -- (In German, with English subtitles) -- A perfectionist chef who lives and breathes her culinary obsession wonders why her boss has insisted she see a psychiatrist.  Disregarding the absurd notion that the customer is always right, she is given to public displays of rage when someone suggests any slight discrepancy exists in her works of artistry.  Living a mostly self-focused existance, a tragic event suddenly thrusts her into the role of a guardian for her niece, and turns her otherwise carefully structured life on its head.  Complicating her life further is a competing Italian chef who also serves as a romantic foil.  This is a mostly sweet film with a plot that in some respects resembles numerous others you have seen, though with different context and variations on a theme.  Hey, there's a good reason for being formulaic -- it works time and time again.  What makes the film most worthy of your attention are the nuanced performances, so subtle and credible, from a talented though decidedly unglamorous cast.   The subtlety of the performances are a perfect complement to the precise and careful touches of a master chef.  You'll savour the feast for the eyes, but will be bound to leave the theater hungry by the sight of it.  (Tasty for all ages, though a little slowly paced for some folks, particularly younger ones)  **1/2

Secretary -- Sado-masachistic, misogynistic, obsessive-submissive, but somehow liberating, this film is likely to make you feel at times very uncomfortable and at other times quite amused.  You may not like parts of what you see, but in hindsight, as you ponder the thoughtful nuances more carefully, the film is likely to leave you affected, which is a sure sign of a good film, though I wouldn't recommend it to anyone lacking broad tolerance for exotic behaviors.   This strange exploration of kinky neuroses, both on an intellectual and physical level, is at times darkly depressing and at many other moments lightheartedly comic.  It won the Audience Award for Originality at the Sundance Film Festival, and yet you may not want to take your friends to see it unless they are the kind with whom you are accustomed to seeing scenes of steamy sexuality, including multiple scenes of masterbation by both the lead actor and lead actress.  The acting is brilliant, and the characters, though pathetically weird, are somehow fully believable in their odd and sometimes demented responses to their repressed and expressed emotions.  The film is well worth the time, but again, I say only if you are quite open minded.  Avoid it absolutely if you are an absolutist.  (Kids -- entirely inappropriate;  the maturist of teens only; adults -- take it, with the qualifiers mentioned above, or steer clear) ***

Sprited Away -- (In Japanese with English subtitles) -- I don't know what kinds of drugs Japanese animators are taking these days, but I don't want any of what they're on.  This film is imaginative to the Nth degree, though pointless as far as I can tell.    The story line is a bit like Alice passing through the looking glass into Wonderland or Judy into the Land of Oz, with a young heroine whose principle goal is to get back to reality from the fantasy world in which she suddenly finds herself.  I don't believe it is nearly as likely to appeal to children as either Wonderland or Oz, as this fantasy world seems far more frightening and unpredictable, but most of all -- even for children -- pointless and uninspiring.  Good characters become bad, and bad characters become good with such unrelenting frequency, that we very soon end up not caring about any of them, least of which a whiny heroine.   My interest ebbed and waned, though it mostly waned.  Since the story line left me patiently awaiting the film's end, I tried at least to find redeeming the film's colorful animation, which admittedly was often fascinating -- mostly for the background, given that the characters themselves, though imaginative, seemed rather flat.  There are probably subtle lessons that the film is trying to impart into children -- regarding generosity, courage, etc. -- but I suspect these mostly get lost in the translation.  The film has gotten good reviews, but it is not one I would recommend either for adults or for children, unless you've got time to kill at the mall with little else to entertain your child.  (Children -- frightning for some, dull for others; teens and adults -- only those with a special appreciation for boundless and pointless fantasy or for animation technique) *

White Oleander -- A teenage girl who is suddenly forced into a foster home after her mother murders an abusive lover continues to navigate through a series of tragedies and through feelings of abandonment.  This is definitely not a feel-good movie, nor is it particularly a tear jerker either.  Actually, it's more of a feel-nothing movie, a refuge any sane person would seek under any similar set of circumstances as those endured by this young girl.  The actress, Alison Lohman, gives a phenomenal performance, and far outshines the other notable names, including Michelle Pfeiffer who plays her psychologically controlling mother, and Robin Wright Penn, Renee Zelwigger and Svetlana Efrenova, who play a series of sadly imperfect foster mothers.  Near the end of the film, the mother-daughter relationship becomes somewhat melodramatic, and the details of past supposedly relevant incidents are left inadaquately explained, but this is a very minor drawback to the film's theme and rhythmn.  Since the film is mainly about the failure of emotional attachments, we end up feeling similarly to the heroin, rather disattached in the end to those around her.  This is a serious film throughout, and don't expect to be particularly uplifted by a mother and daughter coming to terms and a young woman coming to age.  I found it interesting that there were quite a few long-haired blonds in the audience with me, just as there are quite long-haired blonds in the movie.  Perhaps, it's not just opposites that attract.  (Kids -- perhaps not appropriate; teens -- generally okay for mature teens) **1/2
 
 



Return to other movies | Dean's Home Page.